Bush Failed to Protect Us From Terrorist Attack

We all know it's true but when will we actually come out with the story. Bush knew terrorists were planning attacks and did nothing--he *fired* Clarke--the one man who knew the most and could do the most--why? Political motivation. He--and the House and Senate currently at fault for supporting his *politcal* agenda--need to answer for their crimes against America. Now. Before elections:

Cover-up or Complicity of the Bush Administration? The Role of Pakistan's Military Intelligence Agency (ISI) in the September 11 attacks: "In other words, according to the Indian government intelligence report, the perpetrators of the September 11 attacks had links to Pakistan's ISI, which in turn has links to agencies of the US government. What this suggests is that key individuals within the US military-intelligence establishment might have known about the ISI contacts with the September 11 terrorist 'ring-leader' Mohamed Atta and failed to act."

I need to be clear. I do not support the 9/11 Conspiracy theories. I am stating that Bush had more than enough information and evidence from the Clinton administration to begin immediately on the problem and carry forward those protections. He did not. And he made that decision from cynical political interests--not national securty interests.

Republicans were elected to guide and protect this country for a term--not rule this country for a generation--as they intend. Their policy decisions are calculated to cement their political position, not further the American dream. They must be held accountable.